<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dtpennington.com/in-defense-of-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dtpennington.com/in-defense-of-books/</link>
	<description>Great Writing, Awful Food</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 21:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Eat At Dave's - The Dustoff</title>
		<link>http://dtpennington.com/in-defense-of-books/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Eat At Dave's - The Dustoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 02:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dtpennington.com/?p=588#comment-864</guid>
		<description>[...] In Defense of Books [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In Defense of Books [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://dtpennington.com/in-defense-of-books/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dtpennington.com/?p=588#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Very nice composition. I noticed a few grammatical and spelling errors but I figure that&#039;s because you don&#039;t have an editor yet. I rarely have thought about books from this perspective, but now that you mention it I can think of some pretty entertaining events around several of the books on my shelf. My great aunt was a history buff and passed down several works on George Washington from the early 1900s, along with a copy of Tolstoy&#039;s &quot;The Kingdom of God is Within You&quot; from 1951. There&#039;s also &quot;The Modern Wonder Book of Knowledge&quot;, from when modern was 1949. 

My first job ever was in a used book store owned by friends of my parents. I enjoyed the experience and it no doubt influenced my personal view on the same subject. I firmly believe books (with the exception of the collectors and sentimentals) should be shared, passed on, given away etc. Thanks for an entertaining column.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice composition. I noticed a few grammatical and spelling errors but I figure that&#8217;s because you don&#8217;t have an editor yet. I rarely have thought about books from this perspective, but now that you mention it I can think of some pretty entertaining events around several of the books on my shelf. My great aunt was a history buff and passed down several works on George Washington from the early 1900s, along with a copy of Tolstoy&#8217;s &#8220;The Kingdom of God is Within You&#8221; from 1951. There&#8217;s also &#8220;The Modern Wonder Book of Knowledge&#8221;, from when modern was 1949. </p>
<p>My first job ever was in a used book store owned by friends of my parents. I enjoyed the experience and it no doubt influenced my personal view on the same subject. I firmly believe books (with the exception of the collectors and sentimentals) should be shared, passed on, given away etc. Thanks for an entertaining column.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilson Skomal</title>
		<link>http://dtpennington.com/in-defense-of-books/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Skomal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dtpennington.com/?p=588#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t relay how many people I&#039;ve seen both in work and on the outside that qualify themselves as published authors - when what they have in their wings is just website based, serialistic genre crap that a terrible web-based &quot;publisher&quot; has paid pennies for and now owns wholesale. Now I like good Sci Fi and Fantasy as much as the next nerd, but it sure as hell isn&#039;t coming from there. In my book, you can&#039;t really claim you&#039;re an author until I can hold a physical copy of your work in my hand.

Despite the convenience and frugality of digital copy now circulating, it&#039;s an industry that shall follow the same path of the digitalization of music. Ultimately, while self-publishing will allow certain great writers their opportunity to &#039;get the word out&#039;, it will open the floodgate to thousands of people that shouldn&#039;t use the keyboard to much of any creative end, and this has already begun. Though there are more distinctive lines between &quot;good writing and bad writing&quot; than there are between &quot;good music and bad music&quot;, my fear is that it&#039;s all headed into the same deep post-modern pit, where inherent value is a thing of the past, standards are old hat, and the internet is king.

A while ago on eBay I bought a copy of Ignatius T.T. Donnelly&#039;s &quot;Atlantis: The Antediluvian World&quot;. It&#039;s a somewhat infamous book (considered pseudohistory), written by a Minnesota Populist, that believed Plato&#039;s account of the city factual, and which ultimately became source for the majority of what we believe about the mythical nation today. Little did the seller or I know, but the book I received was a pristine first edition, straight from 1882 - complete with a gold inlay of Poseidon. It was neat by itself alone, but it was when I cracked the pages that I found inside preserved newspaper clippings of the explosion of Krakatoa the following year in 1883. Somebody had used the book to collect all sorts of pieces of extraneous news that might concern Atlantis. Somebody had thought that Atlantis might actually exist, and that signs of the myth were happening in their own time. This book and it&#039;s contents were physical proof that someone out there, like me, was hoping that there were answers in fantasy - and that&#039;s something priceless that can only happen in physical media.

God save the printed page. It&#039;s the last bastion against eventual literary breakdown. When we lose that, humanity will have lost a part of its own soul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t relay how many people I&#8217;ve seen both in work and on the outside that qualify themselves as published authors &#8211; when what they have in their wings is just website based, serialistic genre crap that a terrible web-based &#8220;publisher&#8221; has paid pennies for and now owns wholesale. Now I like good Sci Fi and Fantasy as much as the next nerd, but it sure as hell isn&#8217;t coming from there. In my book, you can&#8217;t really claim you&#8217;re an author until I can hold a physical copy of your work in my hand.</p>
<p>Despite the convenience and frugality of digital copy now circulating, it&#8217;s an industry that shall follow the same path of the digitalization of music. Ultimately, while self-publishing will allow certain great writers their opportunity to &#8216;get the word out&#8217;, it will open the floodgate to thousands of people that shouldn&#8217;t use the keyboard to much of any creative end, and this has already begun. Though there are more distinctive lines between &#8220;good writing and bad writing&#8221; than there are between &#8220;good music and bad music&#8221;, my fear is that it&#8217;s all headed into the same deep post-modern pit, where inherent value is a thing of the past, standards are old hat, and the internet is king.</p>
<p>A while ago on eBay I bought a copy of Ignatius T.T. Donnelly&#8217;s &#8220;Atlantis: The Antediluvian World&#8221;. It&#8217;s a somewhat infamous book (considered pseudohistory), written by a Minnesota Populist, that believed Plato&#8217;s account of the city factual, and which ultimately became source for the majority of what we believe about the mythical nation today. Little did the seller or I know, but the book I received was a pristine first edition, straight from 1882 &#8211; complete with a gold inlay of Poseidon. It was neat by itself alone, but it was when I cracked the pages that I found inside preserved newspaper clippings of the explosion of Krakatoa the following year in 1883. Somebody had used the book to collect all sorts of pieces of extraneous news that might concern Atlantis. Somebody had thought that Atlantis might actually exist, and that signs of the myth were happening in their own time. This book and it&#8217;s contents were physical proof that someone out there, like me, was hoping that there were answers in fantasy &#8211; and that&#8217;s something priceless that can only happen in physical media.</p>
<p>God save the printed page. It&#8217;s the last bastion against eventual literary breakdown. When we lose that, humanity will have lost a part of its own soul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cali @caligater</title>
		<link>http://dtpennington.com/in-defense-of-books/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Cali @caligater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dtpennington.com/?p=588#comment-61</guid>
		<description>This is one of the most sonorous pieces I&#039;ve read in a long time. Period. And it&#039;s by far one of the most &quot;convincing&quot; pieces (though I&#039;m not sure you intended it to be) about why paper books should not be shadowed by digital readers.

I have books on my shelves that I loathe...but were passed along to me, dedicated, inscribed, dog-eared by the giver, or otherwise gifted to me in some way, shape or form. I disliked the book (sometimes) or lost connection with the person who gave me the book (most times) -- yet I keep them on my shelf. They remind me of a mood, a moment.

I haven&#039;t yet got an ereader. As much as I love digital toys, I really am resistant to reading books digitally. I love everything about a book as you&#039;ve so beautifully described here.

I want to print this out, bind it and set it on my shelf...because it&#039;s a story of YOU. Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the most sonorous pieces I&#8217;ve read in a long time. Period. And it&#8217;s by far one of the most &#8220;convincing&#8221; pieces (though I&#8217;m not sure you intended it to be) about why paper books should not be shadowed by digital readers.</p>
<p>I have books on my shelves that I loathe&#8230;but were passed along to me, dedicated, inscribed, dog-eared by the giver, or otherwise gifted to me in some way, shape or form. I disliked the book (sometimes) or lost connection with the person who gave me the book (most times) &#8212; yet I keep them on my shelf. They remind me of a mood, a moment.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t yet got an ereader. As much as I love digital toys, I really am resistant to reading books digitally. I love everything about a book as you&#8217;ve so beautifully described here.</p>
<p>I want to print this out, bind it and set it on my shelf&#8230;because it&#8217;s a story of YOU. Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Klosowski</title>
		<link>http://dtpennington.com/in-defense-of-books/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Klosowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dtpennington.com/?p=588#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Ahh, I&#039;ve heard the Fast Times story....

I like the blog man, keep it up.  I&#039;ll have to add it to my RSS feed so I can read it on my cold and lifeless eReader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, I&#8217;ve heard the Fast Times story&#8230;.</p>
<p>I like the blog man, keep it up.  I&#8217;ll have to add it to my RSS feed so I can read it on my cold and lifeless eReader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

